Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)

Citation
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Parent Document
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1986-02-18

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Full Text

502 chars
All of these notice requirements would be superfluous if respondents’ interpretation prevailed here. State law requires less notice than what the regulations require. Leases could be written to supercede applicable federal regulations with state law. This is what respondents claim should happen here: state law was complied with, as was the lease, therefore the federal notice regulations are inapplicable. Federal notice requirements apply only when state law requires a notice, in respondents’ view.