Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)

Citation
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Parent Document
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1986-02-18

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Full Text

906 chars
Jeffrey and Carolyn Kleinschmidt appeal from a judgment entered July 31, 1985, that they had unlawfully detained certain premises. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found the Kleinschmidts’ continued occupancy of the apartment constitutes a threat to the safety of the other tenants and the management in violation of the lease. The court also found that appellants voluntarily waived their rights under the Tenants Grievance and Appeals Procedures of certain federal regulations. On August 1, 1985, a writ of restitution was issued to Hoglund-Hall, the partnership which owns the apartment building where Kleinsch-midts reside. Based upon an emergency telephone request for relief on August 2, 1985, the Court of Appeals ordered a stay of the writ pending appeal on August 5, 1985. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied a petition for further review of that order on October 4, 1985. We reverse. FACTS