White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Citation
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Parent Document
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
Full Text
606 charsLastly, Bulman argues that the trial court erred when it held that White Cliffs had made reasonable efforts to accommodate her and, thus, had not violated the FHAA. Specifically, she argues that: (1) White Cliffs’ offers of accommodation were not reasonable; and (2) she was entitled to the reasonable accommodation of placing her garbage in the laundry room. We will not disturb the factual findings of the trial court unless they lack evidentiary support. Id. at 230. We review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts de novo. See Big League Entm’t v. Brox Indus., 149 N.H. 480, 482 (2003).