White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Citation
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Parent Document
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
Full Text
343 charsOn appeal, Bulman argues that the trial court erred when it held that: (1) the statutory presumption of retaliation under RSA 540:13-b was not applicable; (2) White Cliffs’ eviction proceeding was not retaliatory; and (3) White Cliffs made reasonable efforts to accommodate her under the FHAA. We address each argument in turn. I. RSA 5b0:13-b