White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Citation
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Parent Document
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
- White Cliffs at Dover v. Bulman, 151 N.H. 251 (2004)
Full Text
480 charsBulman next argues that, even without applying the presumption, the trial court erred in its factual finding that White Cliffs’ possessory action was not retaliatory. We will not disturb the findings of the trial court unless they lack evidentiary support or are erroneous as a matter of law. Olbres v. Hampton Coop. Bank, 142 N.H. 227, 230 (1997). Accordingly, our inquiry is whether the evidence presented to the trial court reasonably supports the court’s findings. Id. at 231.