§ 246
- Citation
- § 246
- Parent Document
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
Full Text
502 charsRSA 540:9. Such a remedy would arguably restore to the tenant his or her right to a reasonable opportunity to avoid the eviction by paying the proved arrearages due while protecting a landlord who may have in good faith served a demand that exceeded the arrearage that the landlord was able to prove. Under the circumstances of this case, however, where there is no finding as to the actual arrearage that was due, we need not decide this question. Here, we conclude that the proper remedy is reversal.