BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- Citation
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- Parent Document
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
- § 246
Full Text
509 charsproving that the landlord did not demand a greater sum than the whole rent in arrears when demand was made. Here, the trial court specifically found that neither party was able to prove the amount of the arrearage — the trial court found simply that an unspecified amount of rent had not been paid as required. As it follows that the landlord failed to prove that she did not demand a greater sum than the whole rent in arrears when demand was made, the trial court erred by awarding judgment to the landlord.