BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)

Citation: BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
Parent Document: BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2328057/buatti-v-prentice/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (26)

BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246

Full Text

335 chars

The Court finds that the Tenant is not current on her rent although the exact amount of arrearage is unclear. Both parties were unable to establish a specific amount due although a finding is entered that rent has not been paid as required [and] that landlord is entitled to possession of the property. Thereafter, the tenant appealed.