BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)

Citation: BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
Parent Document: BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2328057/buatti-v-prentice/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (26)

BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
BUATTI v. Prentice, 27 A.3d 849 (2011)
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246
§ 246

Full Text

175 chars

tenant is not current on her rent. We conclude, however, that the court’s finding that the landlord failed to prove the amount of the arrearage requires reversal in this case.