Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Citation
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-04-14
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
Full Text
257 charsAs a consequence, since the tenancy was reinstated by acceptance of rent for a period during the pendency of the action in the District Court, the tenant was not a trespasser and the determination of the trial justice was both legally and factually correct.