Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Citation
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-04-14
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
Full Text
453 charsThe language of the statute is plain and unambiguous and does not require interpretation. See Citizens For Preservation of Waterman Lake v. Davis, R.I., 420 A.2d 53, 57 (1980); Beaudoin v. Petit, R.I., 409 A.2d 536, 539 (1979); State v. Angell, R.I., 405 A.2d 10, 15 (1979); Vaudreuil v. Nelson Engineering And Construction Co., R.I., 399 A.2d 1220, 1222 (1979). Its terms become operable only after an appeal is taken to the Superior or Supreme Courts.