Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Citation
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-04-14
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
Full Text
399 charsA portion of the “rent” demanded in the invoice applied to a period during the pend-ency of the landlord’s action for possession in the District Court. The acceptance of this rent was found by the trial justice to have reinstated the tenancy. The landlord argues that this finding was erroneous as a matter of law because of the provisions of *195G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 34-20-7 which require: