Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Citation
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-04-14
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
- Bove v. Kates Properties, Inc., 444 A.2d 193 (1982)
Full Text
444 charsThe foregoing rule unambiguously provides that in the event of a transfer of interest the action may be continued by the original party. In this instance the tenant might have moved for substitution or joinder but did not do so. Therefore, under the plain terms of the rule the original landlord could continue the action for the benefit of its successor in interest. See 7A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1958 (1972).