Section 34-11-22
- Citation
- Section 34-11-22
- Parent Document
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-07-26
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
Full Text
518 charsA more significant difference between the statutory power of sale and the 1982 Act relates to the nature of the charges that constitute the basis for the foreclosure and sale. The default referred to in the statutory power of sale refers to the failure of a mortgagor to perform obligations with respect to the secured property and under the promissory note. It does not arise out of the imposition of fines. The mortgagor's obligations can be compared to the obligation of a condominium owner to pay common area fees.