Section 34-36
- Citation
- Section 34-36
- Parent Document
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-07-26
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-36
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
- Section 34-11-22
Full Text
400 charsThe plaintiff argues that the 1982 Act creates a tribunal that exercises judicial power because it gives the condominium association the authority to enforce its fines by foreclosure and sale. The defendants contend that the delegation of power to a condominium association is strikingly similar to the statutory powers granted to a mortgagee, which have been applied within constitutional challenge.