Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Citation
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-06-21
Other Sections in This Document (104)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
- Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
Full Text
825 charsThe plaintiffs have advanced three theories to support their claim for damages: intentional infliction of emotional harm, abuse of process and malicious prosecution. "To prevail on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must show `extreme and outrageous conduct on the part of the defendant.'" Jalowy v. Friendly Home, Inc., 818 A.2d 698, 707 (R.I.2003) (quoting Di-Battista v. State, 808 A.2d 1081, 1088 (R.I. 2002)). "[A] plaintiff must [also] prove physical symptomatology resulting from the alleged improper conduct." Vallinoto v. DiSandro, 688 A.2d 830, 838 (R.I.1997) (citing Reilly v. United States, 547 A.2d 894, 898 (R.I.1988)). With respect to the necessary conduct required to be proven, we have adopted the very high standard set forth in the Restatement (Second) Torts § 46 (1965):