Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)

Citation
Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
Parent Document
Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf, 851 A.2d 1083 (2004)
Jurisdiction
Rhode Island (state)
Effective Date
2004-06-21

Other Sections in This Document (104)

Full Text

708 chars
On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the motion justice erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants because, inter alia, the motion justice consistently overlooked “hard evidence,” failed to consider that the defamation action brought by defendant Ms. Davenport-Metcalf was dismissed with prejudice, and that Berkeley Manor’s action under § 34-18-36 was retaliatory, and that the District Court judge, who presided over the stipulation proceedings, acted in collusion with Berkeley Manor’s counsel during those proceedings. Finally, plaintiffs assert that Ms. Davenport-Metcalf s “false” criminal complaint filed with the Newport police destroys any immunity defendants may have had under § 9-33-2.