Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Citation
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-10-04
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3359368/hardy-v-griffin/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
- Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Full Text
711 charssupra. “The court thereupon proceeded favorably to cite the factors considered by the commission in determining whether an action or practice, while not explicitly in violation of the law or deceptive, is nevertheless unfair: ‘ “(1) whether the practice, without necessarily having been previously considered unlawful, offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law, or otherwise — whether, in other words, it is within at least the penumbra of some common law, statutory, or other established concept of unfairness; (2) whether it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous; (3) whether it causes substantial injury to consumers . . . .” ’ [FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.,