Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)

Citation
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Parent Document
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1989-10-04

Full Text

436 chars
The named defendant’s suggestion that someone “set him up” by spraying on lead paint is entitled to no credence. As for the testimony offered by the defendants that Verrón was observed eating paint out of a can, their own evidence as to the dates of the termination of the manufacture and sale of lead-based paint in Connecticut renders this event, even if it is accepted by this court as having occurred, to be of dubious significance.