Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)

Citation
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Parent Document
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1989-10-04

Full Text

375 chars
In this case of first impression, the plaintiff has claimed damages on a theory of strict liability because of the defendants’ alleged violation of both state statutes and a city ordinance. The failure to keep the premises free of lead-based paint is claimed to be the violation and is also the basis for a claim made under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA).