Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)

Citation
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Parent Document
Hardy v. Griffin, 569 A.2d 49 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1989-10-04

Full Text

477 chars
ing him of the presence of lead paint at 18 Arthur Street. On prior occasions, he had been put on notice that repairs to this unit were required. The plaintiff testified that she had seen Verrón eating paint chips, which prompted her to have him tested for the presence of lead in his blood. She also stated that the apartment was painted by the defendants but that the previous coat of paint was not scraped. This underlying coat was described as “thick, chipped and peeling.”