DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-01-31
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326384/haslam-james-v-lawrence/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

313 chars 
The plaintiff next claims that the trial court erred in concluding that the defendant’s actions did not violate CUTPA. The plaintiff argues that the trial court should have found a violation of CUTPA under that statute’s public policy prong based on the court’s finding that the defendant violated § 47a-43 (a). 7