HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation: HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document: HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-01-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326384/haslam-james-v-lawrence/ ↗

Full Text

610 chars

The plaintiff, Katari Haslam-James, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant, Kimberly Lawrence, on two counts of her revised entry and detainer complaint. The plaintiff claims that the court erred in (1) concluding that the defendant’s actions did not constitute an unlawful entry in violation of General Statutes § 47a-16 and thereby entitle her to damages under General Statutes § 47a-18a and (2) concluding that the defendant’s actions did not violate the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text