HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- Citation
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- Parent Document
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2012-01-31
Other Sections in This Document (50)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Full Text
535 charsthat the occupant has not abandoned the dwelling unit.” (Emphasis added.) Thus, the foregoing sentence in § 47a-11b (c) requires an examination of the reasonableness of a landlord’s knowledge in circumstances where an abandonment of a dwelling unit has not occurred. Although this statute is of limited applicability under the facts of this case, in which the defendant already has resorted to the dispossession procedure provided by the summary process statutes, we find its reference to a reasonableness standard to be instructive. 6