Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-01-31

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

358 chars
defendant’s actions constituted a violation of § 47a-16 and she sought damages pursuant to § 47a-18a. In the third count, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s actions on August 6 in changing the locks to her apartment and refusing her access through the end of the period staying execution violated both the terms of the parties’ stipulation and CUTPA.