NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- Citation
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Source
- Official source
Related Parts of This Source
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
Full Text
1,206 charsStabilization Code (RSC) states that the legal regulated rent in cases like this shall be established at the lowest of the following amounts set forth in subparagraph (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of paragraph (3) of 9 NYCCRR §2522.6 or §2526.7, or §2526.1; and that the use of the default formula three without review of the other methods is a misapplication of law and must be corrected before the assessment of overcharge damages can be determined. The petitioner also alleged that the $9,505.84 in arrears included the rental period February 2024 through July 2024 where there was no lease between the parties due to the owner's refusal to provide one as legally required; that the RA ignores that there is no contractual basis for the collection of rent during said period; that the Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) prohibits the implication of a month to month tenancy as it cannot be reconciled with the rights and responsibilities of an owner and tenant of a rent stabilized apartment, citing Fairfield Beach 9 th , LLC. v. Shepard-Neely, 74 Misc.3d 14, 15 [App Term, 2D Dept., 11 th & 13th Jud Dis 2 o 21 } . The Commissioner, having reviewed the evidentiary record, finds that the PAR should be denied.