NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- Citation
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Source
- Official source
Related Parts of This Source
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
- NYS DHCR Office of Rent Administration, Overcharge R-PAR Orders (July 1 - Sept 29 2025, Part 1)
Full Text
1,554 charsOn PAR, the petitioner alleges that the RA's order misstates the rental payments and the security deposit; that for the month of February 2021 the order credits a payment of $1,485.12, but he actually paid $890.00 after the parties agreed to a lower rent of $1,565.00 per month; that the lower amount agreed upon reflected the owner refunding the tenant $135.00 from his security deposit and $540.00 in rent (for a 4 months of rental payment difference of $135.00 between $1,700.00 and $1,565.00); that this should leave only one month of a rental payment of $1,700.00; that from October 2020 through January 2024 he paid $1,565.00 per month; that the security deposit should also be reduced to $1,565.00 for purposes of calculating any deposit overage; that the $1,559.00 August 2021 and $1,550.00 May 2022 rental payments reflected an agreement between the owner and tenant to credit the tenant's purchase of hardware related to small repairs; and that for the rental period of October 2020 through January 2024 rental payments should be credited at $1,565.00 without any missed payments and the security deposit should be reduced. The petitioner also asserts that the default formula was applied incorrectly; that the law requires that DHCR use the lowest rent resulting from the application of the available formulas; that the RA' s order use·s default method number three which does not take into account the rents in comparable regulated apartments in the building on the base date of which there were three options; that the Rent 2 , NN210015RT