Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller, 335 Conn. 474 (2020)

Citation
Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller, 335 Conn. 474 (2020)
Parent Document
Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller, 335 Conn. 474 (2020)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2020-04-27

Other Sections in This Document (122)

Full Text

2,078 chars
responsibility for the aforesaid conduct nor offered this
         court any assurance that such conduct will not be
         repeated, based upon either her commitment to improv-
         ing her knowledge of appellate practice and procedure
         or her institution of changes in her law practice to
         monitor her cases more effectively and ensure timely
         compliance with our rules of procedure.
           ‘‘IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
            ‘‘1. Attorney Josephine Smalls Miller is suspended
         from practice before this court in all cases, except for
         the case of [Addo v. Rattray], AC 36837, effective imme-
         diately for a period of six months from issuance of
         notice of this order until June 9, 2015.
           ‘‘2. After June 9, 2015, Attorney Josephine Smalls
         Miller may not represent any client before this court
         until she files a motion for reinstatement and that
         motion has been granted. The motion for reinstatement
         shall not be filed until after June 9, 2015. Any motion
         for reinstatement shall include a personal affidavit in
         which Attorney Josephine Smalls Miller:
            ‘‘A) Commits herself to discharging her professional
         responsibilities before this court in a timely and profes-
         sional manner;
           ‘‘B) Provides documentary proof of successful com-
         pletion of a seminar on legal ethics and a seminar on
         Connecticut appellate procedure;
            ‘‘C) Documents any other efforts since the date of
         this order to improve her knowledge of appellate prac-
         tice and procedure; and
           ‘‘D) Offers this court detailed, persuasive assurances
         that she has implemented changes in her law practice
         designed to ensure full compliance with the rules of
         appellate procedure including a written plan indicating
         what procedures she has implemented in her office to
Page 56                    CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                    November 3, 2020