Section 47a-8
- Citation
- Section 47a-8
- Parent Document
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-07-12
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Gore v. People's Savings Bank, 35 Conn. App. 126 (1994)
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
- Section 47a-8
Full Text
549 charsThe plaintiffs also claim that the trial court improperly refused to instruct the jury on the theory of nuisance. We note that the issue of public nuisance was thrust into the complaint only to the extent that proof of a public nuisance pursuant to § 19-13-B1 (i) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies could constitute negligence per se or strict liability. We, therefore, address the issue of the trial court’s failure to instruct on public nuisance in the context of the issues of negligence per se and strict liability. See footnote 8.