Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)

Citation: Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Parent Document: Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2009-10-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8357287/johnson-v-rufo/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Johnson v. Rufo, 26 Mass. L. Rptr. 226 (2009)
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A
Section 9A

Full Text

520 chars

As to Johnson’s affidavit, most of its statements must be stricken on one or more of three grounds. First, paragraphs five to fifteen, which discuss Johnson’s special needs and his employment history, are irrelevant. Paragraphs fifty-three to sixty-one of his affidavit, which pertain to Johnson’s prior handyman tasks but not the disputed cove base job, are also irrelevant. Similarly, paragraph sixty-three of the affidavit, which states that Johnson has never owned a business, has no relevance to the present action.