Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)

Citation
SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Parent Document
SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2025-07-09

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

1,148 chars
Here, the town has addressed the specific issue of clearing natural vegetation for a solar energy project.  Section 18.9(b) of the bylaw allows the "[c]learing of natural vegetation . . . limited to what is necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the [solar energy] installation . . . ."  There is no suggestion that Sunpin will clear more natural vegetation than is necessary for the project's construction, operation, and maintenance.  Moreover, there has been no showing that this particular parcel has unique characteristics that render it unsuitable to house a solar energy project -- aside from the fact that it is wooded.  In this case, the board ignored the regulatory framework of the bylaw and imposed its view that tree removal -- even that limited to "what is necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the installation" -- "would not encourage the most appropriate use of [the] land."  As such, the decision was rendered in an "unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary" manner.  Wendy's, 454 Mass. at 382, quoting Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Sys., Inc., 429 Mass. 478, 486 (1999).