Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)

Citation
SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Parent Document
SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2025-07-09

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

750 chars
The dissenting board member, Maryanne Reynolds, submitted a statement of reasons (statement) in which she set forth opposing findings and provided a detailed explanation for her vote.  In her statement, which was incorporated into the board's decision, Reynolds stated that "Petersham is a town that prioritizes natural and working lands.  There is a deep and enduring ethos among the inhabitants to conserve, create, restore and employ the natural resources within the town."  Reynolds acknowledged that the project satisfied the requirements of the site plan review but concluded that the requirements for a special permit were not satisfied primarily because "[t]he project is 'strongly discouraged' under applicable state [energy] policy . . . ."