SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)

Citation: SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Parent Document: SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & Another v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM (2025)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2025-07-09
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10625896/sunpin-energy-services-llc-ano... ↗

Full Text

649 chars

Discussion.  We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.  Williams v. Board of Appeals of Norwell, 490 Mass. 684, 689 (2022).  "[S]ummary judgment is appropriate where there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law" (quotation and citation omitted).  Id.  When both parties have moved for summary judgment, the evidence is viewed "in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment is to enter."  Eaton v. Federal Nat'l Mtge. Ass'n, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 216, 218 (2018), quoting Albahari v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Brewster, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 245, 248 n.4 (2010).

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text