Showing results 41–60
note – Coun. J. 12-20-25, p. 39283, Art. II, § 4, repealed § 6-110-100, which pertained to retaliation prohibited
worker signing the document, should the worker choose to sign, and that the employer may not discriminate or retaliate against the worker should the worker refuse to provide consent or later revoke consent. The written and oral information shall
shall not terminate a tenancy, fail to renew a tenancy, refuse to enter into a rental agreement, or otherwise retaliate in the rental of a dwelling based substantially on: (i) the tenant, applicant, or a household member's status
increased rent, when; action for possession, when. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services after: (1) The tenant has complained to a governmental agency, charged with responsibility
remedies; increased rent, when; action for possession, when. (a) Except as provided in this section, a landlord shall not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services or by failing to renew a rental agreement after any of the following
shall be evicted unless the person's right to possession has ended and no person shall be evicted in retaliation for the exercise of the person's lawful rights. If you are depositing rent with the clerk of this court
arises, unless the plaintiff establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the termination of tenancy was not in retaliation for the acts. If the defendant's alleged attempt to secure or enforce rights or to complain against the plaintiff
means including the termination or substantial reduction of heat, water or electricity to the dwelling unit, in retaliation against a tenant because the tenant has: ATCP 134.09(5)(a)(a) Reported a violation of this chapter or a building
eviction action, including defenses as to the landlord’s title to the premises and whether the eviction is in retaliation for the tenant’s reporting housing violations, but not including violations of federal antitrust and state franchise laws—as well
there is a preponderance of evidence that the action or inaction would not occur but for the landlord’s retaliation against the tenant for doing any of the following: 704.45(1)(a)(a) Making a good faith complaint about
Prevent and prohibit the facilitation of any discriminatory act forbidden by this Title. (3) Prevent and prohibit any retaliation. (4) Eliminate the existence of and the development of any racially concentrated areas of poverty in the community. (5) Effectuate
prejudiced by the amendment. b. For an amendment to add allegations of additional unrelated discriminatory acts and/or acts of retaliation that arose after the filing of the original complaint if: (1) the amendment is filed within one (1) year
status with regard to public assistance. A reprisal includes, but is not limited to, any form of intimidation, retaliation or harassment. It is a reprisal for an employer to do any of the following with respect to an individual because
time, the tenant may contact the Department about the rental housing unit's conditions without fear of retaliation or reprisal. 2. The contact information for the Department as well as the right of a tenant to request repairs and maintenance
Reprisal or retaliation actions against floating home owners. A. The owner or operator of a floating home moorage shall not take or threaten to take reprisals or retaliatory action against a floating home owner because of any good faith exercise
Except as provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by discriminatorily increasing rent or decreasing services or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession because: (1) the tenant has complained to a governmental agency charged
landlord against tenant prohibited; remedies; exceptions. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, the landlord may not, in retaliation, terminate a tenancy, refuse to renew a tenancy, increase rent or decrease essential items or services required by the rental
stalking regardless of whether there exists a current protective order. A landlord shall not deny a tenancy or retaliate against a tenant because the applicant or tenant has previously terminated a rental agreement because the applicant or tenant
Retaliatory conduct prohibited. (a) Except as provided in (c) and (d) of this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession after the tenant
proper action for possession of the premises after termination of a month-to-month residency, where the owner is retaliating against the resident for complaining about noisy neighbors. Casa Blanca Mobile Home Park v. Hill, 1998- NMCA