Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 126 results

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021) United States federal

Neither is there a triable issue as to whether the District’s decision to increase the security deposit to $180, rather than a smaller amount, serves in a significant way the District’s legitimate interest in guaranteeing that it will...

Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation, 920 F.2d 996 (1990)

Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation, 920 F.2d 996 (1990) United States federal

...Theatre damages consisting of all unpaid rents and related charges due since March 31, 1988, less the security deposit and rents received since that date. On December 22 it entered a judgment that in addition found the lessor “entitled to...

Freddie Douglas v. Metro Rental Services, Inc., 827 F.2d 252 (1987)

Freddie Douglas v. Metro Rental Services, Inc., 827 F.2d 252 (1987) United States federal

The plaintiffs finally gained the apartment, and in addition, with the settlement and the damages awarded under this revision, will have received a total of about $43,000 in damages plus the return of the security deposit. We consider that...

Crochet v. Housing Authority, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)

Crochet v. Housing Authority, 37 F.3d 607 (1994) United States federal

...by categorical acceptance of TECO’s belief’ that a tenant owes an arrearage or security deposit. (R.l-1 at 21.) This argument is based on the provision in all THA leases that requires tenants to maintain utility service as...

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021) United States federal

...Appellants’ expert compared (1) those District customers to whom the Security Deposit Policy applied (public housing residents of Pinal County); and (2) those remaining District customers to whom the policy did not apply (non-public housing residents) to determine whether...

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021) United States federal

...After years of failed tactics and fruitless negotiations with Pinal County, the District imposed a new policy that increased to $180 the refundable security deposit required of new public housing customers before the District would agree to provide water services...

Jankowski Lee & Associates v. Cisneros, 91 F.3d 891 (1996)

Jankowski Lee & Associates v. Cisneros, 91 F.3d 891 (1996) United States federal

...RPDC owns RPA In addition, documentation provided by the Petitioners establishes that Sellin sent Rusinov’s security deposit to RPDC in 1986 for “deposit ... into the appropriate interest bearing accounts.” Finally, in a letter in response to HUD’s request...

Jankowski Lee & Associates v. Cisneros, 91 F.3d 891 (1996)

Jankowski Lee & Associates v. Cisneros, 91 F.3d 891 (1996) United States federal

...In addition, documentation provided by the Petitioners establishes that Sellin sent Rusinov's security deposit to RPDC in 1986 for "deposit ... into the appropriate interest bearing accounts." Finally, in a letter in response to HUD's request for information and...

Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)

Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994) United States federal

26 Because the security deposits and arrearage arrangements required by TECO are not paid to THA, are not within the HUD definition of rent, and are not compensation for the use of land, they are not considered rent under the...

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021) United States federal

...2 Appellants’ amended complaint alleged that the District’s Security Deposit Policy “injured plaintiffs by discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, familial status and disability in the provision of municipal services and in the interference with...

Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)

Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000) United States federal

15 As regards the requested $3000 security deposit on the Seminole property, Mr. Flood stated that the additional $2400 he requested of the Badamis (the difference between the deposit requested of the Badamis and the $600 deposit requested of other...

Section 101

Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979) United States federal

In addition to their Relocation Act claims, several tenants alleged in the complaint that HUD should not have applied their security deposits to offset rent deficiencies. The tenants contended that HUD had breached an implied warranty of habitability for the...

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021) United States federal

to apply the Security Deposit Policy is readily explainable on grounds of common-sense business practices: businesses must be paid for their services to stay in business. These grounds are other than race or familial status. Nor is there any...

Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)

Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994) United States federal

...by categorical acceptance of TECO's belief" that a tenant owes an arrearage or security deposit. (R.1-1 at 21.) This argument is based on the provision in all THA leases that requires tenants to maintain utility service as...