Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)

Citation
Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)
Parent Document
Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Tampa, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)
Effective Date
1994-11-04

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

432 chars
26
Because the security deposits and arrearage arrangements required by TECO are not paid to THA, are not within the HUD definition of rent, and are not compensation for the use of land, they are not considered rent under the Brooke Amendment. Thus, the district court correctly concluded that THA's proposed conversion from checkmetering to retail service does not violate the Brooke Amendment, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1437a. C. Due Process