Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)

Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983) United States federal

On December 9, 1980, the district court ruled that the eviction proceedings violated the notice provisions established by HUD regulations,6 and the court therefore issued a preliminary injunction against eviction of appellees and all tenants of section 221(d...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...That injunction forbade the Defendants from increasing rents or evicting tenants in the complex due to non-payment of increased rent until Defendants properly complied with the notice requirements. Defendants served another notice on July 25, 2008. This notice was...

Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002)

Farrell v. Cassano, 34 F. App'x 11 (2002) United States federal

...The district court correctly determined that Farrell failed to raise a viable claim of retaliation because the defendants served a thirty-day notice telling Farrell of their intent to have him evicted before he filed his federal suit. Nor can...

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003) United States federal

The 1991 HUD regulations promulgated certain provisions concerning pre-eviction notice and tenants' post-termination grievance rights. In addition, Congress modified the U.S. Housing Act in 1983. The 1983 Congressional legislation set forth administrative grievance procedure regulations and requirements...

Michael Neudecker v. Boisclair Corporation, 351 F.3d 361 (2003)

Michael Neudecker v. Boisclair Corporation, 351 F.3d 361 (2003) United States federal

183 F.3d 1043, 1050-52 (9th Cir.1999) (holding in summary judgment case that tenant established pri-ma facie FHA claim where she presented evidence that she suffered emotional distress and feared eviction due to notices she received in...

Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)

Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992) United States federal

...termination notice, that the tenant is entitled to a court proceeding pursuant to State or local law at which he or she may present a defense to the eviction. The [landlord] is prohibited from resort to “self-help” evictions or...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...The notice provisions provide that an owner may not evict tenants or increase the rent until one year after providing an “opt-out” notice to tenants and the Secretary. 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(c)(8). Defendants argue that it...

Lutul Love v. United States Department Of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)

Lutul Love v. United States Department Of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983) United States federal

12 On December 9, 1980, the district court ruled that the eviction proceedings violated the notice provisions established by HUD regulations,6 and the court therefore issued a preliminary injunction against eviction of appellees and all tenants of section 221...

Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)

Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986) United States federal

...It held that the tenants retained a protected property interest in their leases despite having received legally sufficient notice to terminate because the .PHA had the authority to evict only for cause. Id. at 927. Appellants in this case similarly...

Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992)

Hussion v. Madigan, 950 F.2d 1546 (1992) United States federal

...termination notice, that the tenant is entitled to a court proceeding pursuant to State or local law at which he or she may present a defense to the eviction. The [landlord] is prohibited from resort to "self-help" evictions or...

Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)

Alice Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986) United States federal

...It held that the tenants retained a protected property interest in their leases despite having received legally sufficient notice to terminate because the PHA had the authority to evict only for cause. Id. at 927. Appellants in this case similarly...

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

...a protected tenancy status for certain senior citizens, their spouses, and certain disabled persons who could otherwise have been evicted under the Anti-Eviction Act on three years' notice plus the tender of comparable rental housing or hardship relocation compensation.

section of

Connie Burton v. Tampa Housing Authority, 271 F.3d 1274 (2001) United States federal

...administrative agency charged with implementing the eviction provision construed it to permit eviction of ignorant tenants. This interpretation had been challenged in both policy and constitutional grounds before Congress and in HUD’s notice and comment procedures. Congress itself has...

Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (1974)

Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (1974) United States federal

Shortly after the hearing officer rendered his decision, Phipps served a 30-day notice of termination of tenancy; on September 11, summary eviction proceedings were instituted. These led to a warrant of eviction which the state court stayed until September...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...The notice provi- sions provide that an owner may not evict tenants or increase the rent until one year after providing an “opt-out” notice to tenants and the Secretary. 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(c)(8). Defen-  PARK VILLAGE...

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995) United States federal

...The applicable regulation states that “[i]f the notice of termination fails to meet the technical requirements of preparation, the Servicing Official will ... [ijnform the borrower [i.e., landlord] to cease the [eviction and] [i]nform the borrower that it...

Section 2

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969) United States federal

...Department of Housing and Urban Development concerning notice to tenants of reasons for their eviction. The only possible issue therefore is whether the directive should apply to Mrs. Thorpe, against whom eviction proceedings were started prior to the effective date...

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969) United States federal

In addition to informing the tenant of the reason (s) for any proposed eviction action, from this date each Local Authority shall maintain a written record of every eviction from its federally assisted public housing. Such records are to be...

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967) United States federal

“In addition to informing the tenant of the reason(s) for any proposed eviction action, from this date each Local Authority shall maintain a written record of every eviction from its federally assisted public housing. Such records are to be...

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967) United States federal

"In addition to informing the tenant of the reason(s) for any proposed eviction action, from this date each Local Authority shall maintain a written record of every eviction from its federally assisted public housing. Such records are to be...