DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 372 results

Section 220

Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973) United States federal

10 On August 26 and 27, 1970, FHA granted a second round of rental increases, which was allegedly accompanied by the setting of new methods for calculating maximum rental increases allowable under the required rent schedule. Tenants' Council again tried...

§ 1437f

Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015) United States federal

Practically, the formula for calculating a tenant’s expected rent contribution means that a decision by the public housing agency to increase the payment standard will generally yield larger subsidies. By contrast, a decrease in the payment standard will generally...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

In a prior action, the district court enjoined the proposed rent increase because Defendants failed to comply with the notice requirements of § 1437f(c)(8). We affirmed. Park Vill. Apartments Tenants Ass’n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, No. 06- 7389...

§ 982

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC, 583 F.3d 1197 (2009) United States federal

at § 151.06C, but thereafter, the landlord may only increase the rent in small increments each year, absent special permission, id.

§ 1437f

Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015) United States federal

...Those letters explained that the change to the payment standard “means many tenants will soon begin paying more rent or, if they choose, move to a less expensive unit,” and that the “average increase is estimated at $100/month.”24...

Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017)

Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017) United States federal

Specifically, the Interim Report found that SAFMRs in the pilot PHAs make "the availability of units [ ] much more evenly distributed across different types of neighborhoods, leading to increased availability in high-rent ZIP Codes and reduced availability in low-rent...

Waleska Velez v. Cuyahoga Metro. Housing Authority, 795 F.3d 578 (2015)

Waleska Velez v. Cuyahoga Metro. Housing Authority, 795 F.3d 578 (2015) United States federal

...Tenants that enter into short-term leases that have a single, increased rent charge would have their full amount of rent qualify for subsidy under the Act. Conversely, tenants entering into short-term leases that impose two separate charges would...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...On August 31, 2009, Defendants served notice of a rent increase, effective October 1, 2009, to individual Plaintiffs. The amount of the rent increase is not at issue here.

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

matter. The Cooperativa also tabled any increase in Batista's rent for Unit 1714A until it heard back.

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977) United States federal

In contrast, counsel represented to us that the rent schedule applicable to tenants in NCHA projects has not been revised upward since the disputed increase in 1970. By ordering only that future rent increases comply with the requirements of Thompson...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...On August 31, 2009, Defendants served notice of a rent increase, effec- tive October 1, 2009, to individual Plaintiffs. The amount of the rent increase is not at issue here.

Section 888

Open Cmtys. Alliance v. Carson, 286 F. Supp. 3d 148 (2017) United States federal

should increase the pool of units potentially available ... in high-rent FMRs, while reducing the pool of units that are located in lower-rent ZIP codes .... the gain in units with rents below the applicable FMR in high-rent ZIP...

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989) United States federal

The lease in the instant case provided generally that “[increases in rent are to be made effective the first of the month following that in which the change occurred.” (Emphasis added). Appellant’s lease expressly authorized retroactive rent charges in...

Section 205

Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977) United States federal

...In the following weeks the sponsor of the project requested another increase in the maximum amount of the insured mortgage. Because of the past history of the project and since this increase would require rents in excess of what tenants...

Reverend Chester C. Thompson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Walter E. Washington, Individually and as Commissioner of the District of Columbia and as "The Authority" of the National Capitol Housing Authority Under Executive Order Elizabeth Marshall v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Individually and in Her Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 551 F.2d 1316 (1977)

Reverend Chester C. Thompson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Walter E. Washington, Individually and as Commissioner of the District of Columbia and as "The Authority" of the National Capitol Housing Authority Under Executive Order Elizabeth Marshall v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Individually and in Her Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 551 F.2d 1316 (1977) United States federal

5 This court's decisions in Thompson I and Marshall I upheld the merits of the tenants' claims to an opportunity to be heard on proposed rent increases, and reversed the District Court's judgments in favor of the housing...

Section 220

Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973) United States federal

1 This case is one of three related cases decided today which involve the procedural rights of tenants of housing, constructed under various provisions of the Federal housing legislation, prior to official approval of rent increases. In Thompson v. Washington...

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977) United States federal

...Although the current rent schedule implicates greater reliance interests than would future rent increases, we must be careful not to give short shrift to the functional rationale underlying Thompson I, that is to say, the possibility that tenants will bring...

Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 911 F.2d 1302 (1990)

Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 911 F.2d 1302 (1990) United States federal

...Hillvale then agreed to forbear any rent increases or eviction proceedings from December 1, 1988, until March 1, 1989, reserving the right to retroactively collect rent increases during that period should it prevail on the merits. By order of February...

Section 14

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

. Section 13.6 of the Springfield ordinance authorizes the landlord to apply for a “Rate of Return” increase if the landlord’s ratio of operating expenses to gross rents exceeds 60 percent. Section 13.5 authorizes the landlord to apply...