Showing 21–36 of 36 results
In 1995, after an extensive market review for a rental update of its properties, the state proposed increasing rents to their fair market values and held public meetings to explain the appraisal process. In August 1995, the state mailed proposed...
Because of the condition of the premises, including housing violations, defendant refused to pay the increased rent. Instead, she continued to pay $600 per month; plaintiff cashed her check, but sent a deficiency notice each month. After receiving her first...
...On the day he closed on the property and title was conveyed to him, plaintiff sent defendant a new rental agreement providing that as of February 1, 2004, the rent would increase from $600 a month to $825 and that...
...Under the new agreement, rent was increased to $1171 per month, designed to reflect Halpin's costs related to mortgage payments, taxes, and other carrying fees. However, the Hendersons never signed or returned the new proposed lease, which was to...
...Having found that the Plaintiff is entitled only to the agreed upon $2,500 per month renders moot any discussion regarding the Defendant's obligation to increased rent during the pendency period for an appeal.
...rent may be changed upon 60 days notice. See also G.L. § 31-44-1.2. The defendant further asserts that the decision in Baker compelled the defendant to reform the leases to provide for uniform application of rental increases...
...effectively a perpetual tenant of the park, and [that] the increase in the mobile home’s value thus represents the right to occupy a pad at below-market rent indefinitely.” Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519, 527...
...effectively a perpetual tenant of the park, and [that] the increase in the mobile home's value thus represents the right to occupy a pad at below-market rent indefinitely." Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519, 527...
(b) An increase in rent, nonrenewal of lease, refusal to offer a lease, or termination of tenancy, taken by a licensee against a resident or prospective resident has taken any protected lawful action, shall create a rebuttable presumption that the...
...There being no breach on behalf of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs argue that the defendant must therefore renew the lease agreement inclusive of the present terms.3 The failure to do so, by implementing new leases that increased the rent...
In 1992, many of the same plaintiffs filed suit against the defendant alleging that Tuckertown Village Association unlawfully raised their rents by implementing and applying a nonuniform rental increase methodology that was inconsistent with the General Laws of Rhode Island...
...Second, the plaintiff and defendant were in disagreement about the amounts owed for the interest calculated on overdue balances and the application of prior rent and operating expense payments. Third, the defendant erred by failing to increase the January 1997...
...Waiver cannot be implied by the acceptance of increased rent as it must be "manifested in some unequivocal manner not found here." Hudson Oil Co. of Mobilev. McLeod, 424 F.2d 1269, 1271 (5th Cir. 1970).
...Specifically, the Plaintiff has, from time to time, increased Defendant's rent. In this Court's opinion, those oral modifications, after the lease elapsed, are sufficient to appropriately bring this transaction within the purview of §34-18.1-4. Therefore...
I note also that, pursuant to § 31-44-5(b), park owners and operators are forbidden from taking reprisals against their resident tenants for having engaged in “any protected lawful action.” Moreover, “[a]n increase in rent, nonrenewal of lease...
I note also that, pursuant to § 31-44-5(b), park owners and operators are forbidden from taking reprisals against their resident tenants for having engaged in "any protected lawful action." Moreover, "[a]n increase in rent, nonrenewal of lease...