Showing 1–20 of 26 results
383.705 Retaliatory conduct. (1) Except as provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession after: (a) The tenant has complained to...
“A notice by a landlord to a tenant that if he continues to occupy the premises beyond the present term he must pay an increased rent, naming the sum, will not bind the tenant, although he holds over, unless the...
...This is formal notice that effective October 1, 1995, the rent for the premises will be increased from $950 to $1250 a month. If this rental increase is acceptable to you, then payment of the new rent amount will be...
...This is formal notice that effective October 1, 1995, the rent for the premises will be increased from $950 to $1250 a month. If this rental increase is acceptable to you, then payment of the new rent amount will be...
In January 1976, movant informed the respondents that he was increasing the rent from $200 to $500 per month. From then until November 1976, no rent was paid, and movant notified respondents to vacate the property within thirty days. Respondents...
...Effective July 1, 1947, under the Federal Rent Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., landlords were authorized to increase rentals by 15%, provided tenants agreed to the raise.'- Jensen did not agree to this increase...
Under the agreement with lessees, Tackett paid rent to them, which was increased when the addition to the building was added. Tackett stopped paying rent when the building burned. Lessees paid the monthly rental called for under their lease to...
. For the year ending February 28, 1961, the rent paid was $55,020.99, which was expected to increase to $60,000 in the following year. 3 . Not school taxes, however. 4
...Although it appears that the tenant objected to the increase in the rent and declined to execute a new lease at the increased rate, yet it appears that he held over after his term expired, and for four months paid...
...The rent was tendered monthly, and the tenant increased the rent $100.00 per month when the fifth year of tenancy began. The tenant vacated the premises after giving one month’s notice, seven months shy of the entire six...
...Appellant -occupied the flat so rented throughout the year of his term. On April 14,1921, appellant was notified by letter, which he admits he received, that after the expiration of his term there would be an increase of $15...
...The son continued to occupy these rooms for eight or ten years and then took possession also of two rooms on the second floor, increasing the rent paid to $30 a month. Although Mrs. Dickerson testified that her son rented...
...the increased rental. This is all borne out by the letters which passed between Walker and Cosgrove and their representatives. There is likewise no merit in appellant Walker’s claim that the appellee, Cosgrove, failed to pay the rents upon...
...Appellant accepted this offer by holding over and paying the rent at the increased rate. The contract was not made until appellee’s offer of terms was accepted by appellant and at the earliest that could not have occurred before...
...The lease further provides for automatic increases until a cap of $5,000 is reached, and then the amount of rent shall “remain constant.”
...the tenant that the amount of the rent will be increased in a definite amount following the expiration of the lease, the tenant, by holding over and paying the rental at the increased rate, thereby accepts the landlord’s terms...
...H., 512, under leases giving the tenant the privilege of renewal for a further term, it was held that the tenant by remaining in possession and paying the rent, exercised his option. But these cases when analyzed are very similar...
In accordance with the above principles we are clearly of the opinion that the conduct of the parties in this case, before any controversy arose (the occupancy of the lessee and the acceptance of the increased rent by the lessor...
...Defendant declined to vacate the premises, as required by the notice, or to pay the increased rentals requested, or to do anything more than occupy them at a rental of $120.00 per month, as he had done since February...
...The actual operating costs [including taxes], were approximately $27,000, which would leave $20,000 with which to pay the ground rent of $44,000. This deficit of $24,000 increased, in 1932, to more than $30,000. In short...