Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Citation
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Parent Document
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1921-10-21
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
- Klein v. Auto Parcel Delivery Co., 192 Ky. 583 (1921)
Full Text
653 charsIn accordance with the above principles we are clearly of the opinion that the conduct of the parties in this case, before any controversy arose (the occupancy of the lessee and the acceptance of the increased rent by the lessor, which was more than passivity on her part), for four years -after the expiration of the original term, in strict compliance with the provisions for the renewed term, fully demonstrate that the parties intended to and did *589use the word “renew” as synonymous with the word “extend,” and that the circuit court was right when it held defendant not guilty upon the trial of the traverse. Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.