Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 374 results

§ 42-3501

Hum v Duda Final Order, No. TP-29461 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

Even if Tenant would benefit from a presumption of retaliation, Housing Providers have

Section 501

Brock et al. v Kearney Final Order, No. TP-28673 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

retaliating against Tenants Brock, Kibler and White and it is further

Bridges v. Clark, 59 A.3d 978 (2013)

Bridges v. Clark, 59 A.3d 978 (2013) DC municipal

...Clark argues that instructing the jury on the retaliation defense would have resulted in unfair surprise and prejudice. Mr. Clark had ample notice, however, that Ms. Bridges intended to as*985sert a retaliation defense, because Ms. Bridges so stated in...

§ 42-3509

Christine Senteno v Michael Demino Final Order, No. TP-29505 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

The Act creates a presumption of retaliation in situations where a housing

§ 42-3501

Hum v Duda Final Order, No. TP-29461 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

tenant benefits from a presumption of retaliation. If Tenant meets the threshold criteria, she

Section 501

Brock et al. v Kearney Final Order, No. TP-28673 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

Tenants Brock and Kibler claim that Housing Provider retaliated against them by

§ 42-3505

Reed v Tillman Final Order, No. TP-29136 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

constituting willfulness were intended for an illegal purpose. For a retaliation claim "if the

Section 45-2552

Twyman v. Johnson, 655 A.2d 850 (1995) DC municipal

confirms, there is no common law authority for a cause of action for retaliation against a landlord. Habib, supra,

§ 42-3509

Christine Senteno v Michael Demino Final Order, No. TP-29505 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

harassment and violation of privacy within the meaning of "retaliation" under the Act,

§ 42-3509

Christine Senteno v Michael Demino Final Order, No. TP-29505 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

constitute retaliation subject to the presumption, since it occurred within six months of

§ 4303

TP_08_29364__Atkins_v_Williams_Cunningham__et_al.pdf, No. TP-29364 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

presumption of retaliation, including that the housing provider took "an action not

§ 4303

TP_08_29364__Atkins_v_Williams_Cunningham__et_al.pdf, No. TP-29364 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

Sonia Atkins benefits from the presumption of retaliation. which Housing Provider can

§ 4303

TP_08_29364__Atkins_v_Williams_Cunningham__et_al.pdf, No. TP-29364 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

facilities and for retaliation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it is further

§ 42-3505

Reed v Tillman Final Order, No. TP-29136 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

was an act of retaliation. Although Housing Provider spoke of repossessing the unit for his

Section 45-2552

Twyman v. Johnson, 655 A.2d 850 (1995) DC municipal

. By "heretofore” we mean prior to statutory enactment of an anti-retaliation provision in 1975. We note that, although Weisman

§ 42-3509

Christine Senteno v Michael Demino Final Order, No. TP-29505 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

I conclude that Tenant has not proven her claim of retaliation. G. Bad Faith

§ 42-3502

Benitez v Ogden Gardens et al. Final Order, No. TP-29189 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

The Act creates a presumption of retaliation in situations where a housing provider

§ 42-3509

Benitez v Ogden Gardens et al. Final Order, No. TP-29189 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

rebut a presumption of retaliation does not establish the heightened culpability necessary to

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005)

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005) DC municipal

...That presumption ripens automatically into a conclusion of retaliation unless the housing provider rebuts the presumption by clear and convincing evidence. The RHC concluded that the failure alone of a housing provider to rebut the presumption of retaliation does not...

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005)

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005) DC municipal

...That presumption ripens automatically into a conclusion of retaliation unless the housing provider rebuts the presumption by clear and convincing evidence. The RHC concluded that the failure alone of a housing provider to rebut the presumption of retaliation does not...