Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 98 results

O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 215 Conn. 367 (1990)

O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 215 Conn. 367 (1990) Connecticut state

...this section except for one or more of the following reasons: (A) Nonpayment of rent; (B) refusal to agree to a fair and equitable rent increase, as defined in subsection (c) of this section; (C) material noncompliance with section 47a...

Warner Associates v. Logan, 50 Conn. App. 90 (1998)

Warner Associates v. Logan, 50 Conn. App. 90 (1998) Connecticut state

...Although the defendants paid an increased amount of rent equal to the maximum amount permitted by the lease, the plaintiff refused to accept the extension, attempted to add additional terms and sent the defendants a different lease to which they...

Section 21-79

Eamiello v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 208 Conn. 620 (1988) Connecticut state

...General Statutes § 21-80 (b) (5), of course, does require that rent increases on one tenant be “consistent with rents for comparable lots in the same park.” There is no restriction, however, upon a general rent increase for all of...

Section 47a-20

Wilson v. Jefferson, 908 A.2d 13 (2006) Connecticut state

...providing a private cause of action for damages based on retaliatory eviction, but then rejected that option, confident that the intent of the section, to prohibit retaliatory evictions and rent increases, would be accomplished without such a cause of action.

Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025) Connecticut state

...leasing the prem- ises for eleven years and that she continues to pay the original $1200 rent, having refused to pay the rent increase. The court also heard testimony from the defendant’s neighbor and the defendant. In its memorandum...

O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 215 Conn. 367 (1990)

O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 215 Conn. 367 (1990) Connecticut state

...upon the tenant’s “refusal to agree to a fair and equitable rent increase.” The trial court reasoned that, since a tenant at sufferance does not pay rent, but rather pays use and occupancy, this reason for eviction would not...

Groton Townhouse Apartments v. Marder, 435 A.2d 47 (1981)

Groton Townhouse Apartments v. Marder, 435 A.2d 47 (1981) Connecticut state

...When the plaintiff attempted to raise the monthly rent commencing September 1, 1979, the defendants, who held possession under oral month-to-month leases, refused to pay the increase. The plaintiff then started summary process actions against those defendants and...

Section 21-80a

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012) Connecticut state

"(a) An owner shall not maintain an action or proceeding against a resident to recover possession of a dwelling unit or a mobile manufactured home space or lot, demand an increase in rent from the resident, or decrease the services...

Section 21-80a

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012) Connecticut state

"(a) An owner shall not maintain an action or proceeding against a resident to recover possession of a dwelling unit or a mobile manufactured home space or lot, demand an increase in rent from the resident, or decrease the services...

Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)

Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986) Connecticut state

...The obligation to pay increases in taxes is to be met unequivocably by a date certain in the same manner as a payment of rent. Its purpose is to provide the landlord with funds to make such payments before the...

Section 47a-20

Wilson v. Jefferson, 908 A.2d 13 (2006) Connecticut state

General Statutes § 47a-20, which is entitled “Retaliatory action by landlord prohibited,” provides: “A landlord shall not maintain an action or proceeding against a tenant to recover possession of a dwelling unit, demand an increase in rent from the tenant...

Warner Associates v. Logan, 50 Conn. App. 90 (1998)

Warner Associates v. Logan, 50 Conn. App. 90 (1998) Connecticut state

...When a lease term has expired and, thereafter, the lessee remains in possession and pays increased rent in *97accordance with a renewal option, such payment does not demonstrate that the lessee has exercised its option to renew the lease. David...

Visco v. Cody, 16 Conn. App. 444 (1988)

Visco v. Cody, 16 Conn. App. 444 (1988) Connecticut state

...A landlord shall not maintain an action or proceeding against a tenant to recover possession of a dwelling unit, demand an increase in rent from the tenant, or decrease the services to which the tenant has been entitled within six...

Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025) Connecticut state

...On December 27, 2022, the plaintiff sent the defen- dant a letter notifying her that it would be increasing her rent to $1300 per month, effective February 1, 2023. Since the inception of the lease in 2012, the defendant has...

914 North Colony, LLC v. 99 West, LLC, 226 Conn. App. 720 (2024)

914 North Colony, LLC v. 99 West, LLC, 226 Conn. App. 720 (2024) Connecticut state

...Under the lease, the defendant is responsible for payment of the base rent on the nineteenth day of each month and a 5 percent late fee for any late payments. The base rent amount is subject to an increase at...

Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)

Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000) Connecticut state

...Following the institution of legal proceedings, the defendant continued to pay rent as it had in the past, that is to say, it consistently paid rent, but frequently late. When the disputed property taxes were computed, the defendant paid them...

Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)

Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983) Connecticut state

...A landlord may pass on to any lessee protected by the provisions of this subsection only legitimate and reasonable rent increases, based on the criteria set forth in section 7-148c, including the cost of any assessment for cur *449

Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005)

Rodriguez v. Ancona, 868 A.2d 807 (2005) Connecticut state

...The court awarded the plaintiff $400, the amount of her security deposit, and doubled the damages, increasing the award to $800 pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-21 (d) (2) for the defendant’s failure to return the security deposit on...

ECR 2, LLC v. Thompson (2025)

ECR 2, LLC v. Thompson (2025) Connecticut state

...At some point prior to April 3, Young communicated to the defendant and his HUD- VASH counselor that, in addition to the defendant’s portion of the rent from January to April, he would also have to pay $375 to...

ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)

ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025) Connecticut state

...At some point prior to April 3, Young communicated to the defendant and his HUD- VASH counselor that, in addition to the defendant’s portion of the rent from January to April, he would also have to pay $375 to...