Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)

Citation
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Parent Document
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1992-08-25

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

288 chars
The courts below concluded that the plaintiff had suffered no damages; neither, therefore, had occasion to consider the landlord’s claim for damages under G. L. c. 93A. As we have concluded that damages are due, the question becomes pertinent. In Anthony’s Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC Assocs.,