Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)

Citation
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Parent Document
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1992-08-25

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

618 chars
cerned with the damages owed by them for breach of the lease. A judge of the Boston Municipal Court ruled that the landlord, because he had successfully relet the premises, was not entitled to any damages. The landlord appealed to the Appellate Division of the Boston Municipal Court, which decided that there was no error and dismissed the report. See G. L. c. 231, § 108; Dist./Mun.R.Civ.P. 64 (1975). Thereupon, the landlord exercised his further right of appeal to us conferred by G. L. c. 231, § 109. We are of opinion that the landlord established certain damages and reverse the order of the Appellate Division.