Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)

Citation
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Parent Document
Atkinson v. Rosenthal, 598 N.E.2d 666 (1992)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1992-08-25

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

490 chars
Here the judge found on one hand that the landlord failed to take steps to mitigate damages and, therefore, was entitled to none; on the other hand, the judge found that the new lease was part of such an excellent deal for the landlord that the landlord suffered no damages. The foundation for the latter ultimate finding was the judge’s subsidiary finding “that the improvements to the real estate far exceed any damages alleged to be suffered by plaintiff.” If the “failure to mitigate” 4