Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Citation
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Parent Document
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1997-05-08
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
- Al-Ziab v. Mourgis, 424 Mass. 847 (1997)
Full Text
513 charsPrior to trial the plaintiffs filed a motion in limine to exclude all evidence that the landlords were not aware of the presence of lead paint in the apartment. They argued that the landlords’ actual knowledge of the presence of lead paint was irrelevant because the lead paint statute imposes strict liability on landlords and, the plaintiffs claimed, any violation of that statute would necessarily constitute a violation of the quiet enjoyment statute. The trial judge agreed, and granted the motion in limine.