Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Citation
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-08-26
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
- Rothman v. Rent Control Board, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 (1994)
Full Text
580 charsThe executive director of the board subsequently reviewed the hearing examiner’s actions and determined that there was no violation of its regulations applicable to the hearing *224examiner or the conduct of the hearing. The board, by its decision, implicitly confirmed that opinion, and again we accord considerable deference to that determination. We note that the landlord does not otherwise contest the admissibility, substantiality, or validity of the additional documentation. See Palmer v. Rent Control Bd. of Brookline, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 110, 118 (1979). Judgment affirmed.