section 14
- Citation
- section 14
- Parent Document
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-01-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2038443/simon-v-solomon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (136)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- § 12
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
Full Text
472 charsSolomon’s rent was paid in part by the Federal government, through a rent subsidy program. Gem asserts that the relevant figure for calculating three months’ rent is not the contract rent of $313, but the amount that Solomon paid personally: $73. We disagree. The triple rent clause is not a compensatory provision; it is an alternative to actual damages, designed to deter violations and to encourage tenants to seek relief under § 14. See Darmetko v. Boston Hous. Auth.,