§ 17
- Citation
- § 17
- Parent Document
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-01-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2038443/simon-v-solomon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (136)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Simon v. Solomon, 431 N.E.2d 556 (1982)
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- § 12
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
- section 14
Full Text
622 chars363 Mass. 579, 583-589 (1973). The combination in § 14 of both actual and consequential damages, therefore, suggests that the Legislature intended to include all reasonably foreseeable losses — personal as well as economic — within the scope of statutory recovery. In the present case, not only were Solomon’s injuries foreseeable, but the jury found specifically that Gem knew or should have known that if it permitted floods to occur, Solomon would suffer emotional harm. Therefore, Solomon’s claim for emotional distress was within the scope of § 14, and was properly considered in the determination of attorneys’ fees.